{"id":141740,"date":"1650-01-01T13:53:00","date_gmt":"1650-01-01T11:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oudaalten.nl\/niet-gecategoriseerd\/verponding\/"},"modified":"2026-04-11T12:25:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-11T10:25:03","slug":"verponding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oudaalten.nl\/en\/government\/taxes\/verponding\/","title":{"rendered":"Verponding"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

The verponding was a tax on real estate introduced in Gelderland in 1651 to replace the older schildschatting. This tax was levied on lands, farms, houses, and mills that generated income, with the aim of strengthening provincial finances. Wastelands, such as uncultivated common lands (markegronden), were exempt from this levy. The verponding remained in effect as a tax system in Gelderland until 1805. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Administration and Registration<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Verponding\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>
Fragment from the verponding register for the rural district of Dale near Aalten, c. 1650<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The term ‘verponding’ or ‘pondschatting’ likely refers to a tax assessment originally expressed in the unit of account ‘pond’ (pound). Data regarding the verponding was recorded in so-called verpondingskohieren (tax registers). These registers were compiled by local officials, such as bailiffs, sub-bailiffs, and rotmeesters, who were responsible for recording all real estate and its estimated value. The registers provide valuable historical information regarding the number of houses per location and their owners: nobility, church, or citizens. Additionally, they contain data on the size of holdings, lease structures, and ownership relationships. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Calculation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In the Quarter of Zutphen, to which Aalten and Bredevoort belonged, the amount of the verponding was determined based on the lease or rental value and the burdens resting on a property. For lands and farmsteads, the tax amounted to a sixth penny (or 1\/6) of the taxable lease value; for houses and mills, this was a ninth penny (1\/9) of the taxable rental value. If a property was not leased or rented but used by the owner themselves, the value was determined based on comparable properties that were leased or rented. Everyone was obliged to provide correct information and to show any lease contracts; negligence could result in a fine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Collection and Payment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The collection of the verponding followed a strict schedule: the assessment, also known as ‘maning’ (summons), took place in November, and payment was to be completed before the end of February. The tax could be calculated in various ways, and several deductions were possible, for example, for maintenance. Taxpayers received ‘maancedulen’ (payment notices) stating the amount due. The collected pennies were transferred by the collectors to the receiver of the Quarter. Furthermore, the district, the city, and the Quarter could levy additional surcharges (opcenten) on top of the base amount. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

<\/div>\n\n
\n

Verponding Register of 1647<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Verponding Register of 1647 is a frequently used source for historical research. At the time the verponding registers were compiled, Gerhard Kreynck (1612-1692) was the mayor of Zutphen. Kreynck had a great interest in historical documentation and made copies of important archives, including the verponding register, city accounts, and fief registers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Verponding Register of 1647 was transcribed in an abbreviated form by Kreynck around 1650, which later became known as the Kreynck Transcript. The historical significance of the register lies in the fact that it is one of the first systematically established tax registers in Gelderland. The register provides insight into the economic situation of the region in the mid-17th century. The original register has been preserved and can be found in the National Archives in Arnhem. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

<\/div>\n\n
\n

Sources and Literature<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n